Thursday, 26 April 2012

Factual Storytelling Exercise


Family Affairs 

On Saturday the 24th of March, 2012, John-Paul Langbroek had quite a cause for celebration. His political party, the Liberal-National Party, had just defeated Anna Bligh and her Labor government at the state election, winning a record majority of 78 out of 89 seats. John-Paul himself even snared the most voter support of all the candidates, with 72.93% of the votes in his Surfers Paradise seat. This was quite an incredible feat for a relative newcomer to state politics and for a man who 51 years earlier had begun life in the small Dutch town of Assen, 15 000 kilometres away from what would later become his electorate.



John-Paul was less than a year old when his parents decided that in order for their family to attain the best possible life, they would have to leave the Netherlands and migrate to another country. Both John-Paul and his mother found it very difficult to adjust to the harsh Dutch winter so they chose Australia, a country with a much warmer climate. Joined by hundreds of others, John-Paul and his parents began the long journey from Rotterdam to Brisbane, trapped inside a ship that promised a brighter future when they finally stepped off 6 weeks later.  

John-Paul’s early childhood is a blur of relocating from country to country, from America to Papua New Guinea and then back to Australia, due to his father’s profession as a teacher and both his parents’ roles as missionaries in the religion of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. John-Paul’s parents had met at bible college and continued practicing the faith once they were married. They then chose to raise John-Paul and his younger sister, Kate, by its autocratic principles. Growing up, John-Paul never questioned the religion and the values it upheld. However, like most teenagers during adolescence he began to question whether some of the teachings that had been instilled within him from childhood were really as absolute as he had once believed.  

These concerns only continued to increase as John-Paul completed high school and began his university education, studying to become a dentist. It was at the University of Queensland School of Dentistry where he would meet Stacey Smith, the woman who would later become his wife and mother of his 3 children. The two had met in 1982 when she was paired with him for training purposes. She was the (slightly) older, quick-witted dental assistant and he was the (slightly) nerdy, determined dentist. Although she was in a relationship at the time of their initial meeting, some months later they realised that they belonged together. 

However, their relationship was not without its challenges. The guidelines of the religion meant that John-Paul was supposed to marry from within the church of Jehovah’s Witnesses. When it became clear that John-Paul was going to have to deny his love for Stacey he made a decision that was undoubtedly going to change his life forever. At 22 years old, John-Paul and his parents boarded a plane from Brisbane that was going to take them to the Jehovah’s Witness headquarters in New York. John-Paul had recently graduated from the University of Queensland with an honours degree in Dental Science and had told his parents that the move to New York was so that he could begin his life as a missionary for the religion. However, in the lobby of the headquarters, John-Paul informed his parents that he was abandoning the religion and moving to London to live and work as a dentist. Leaving his stunned parents in New York and flying half way across the world to London to begin life as an independent 22-year-old was the biggest decision John-Paul ever made; and it changed his life forever.  

Six months later, Stacey joined John-Paul in England and the two lived happily in a townhouse with another couple. Whilst their weekends were often disrupted by the knocking of Jehovah’s Witness missionaries, sent on behalf of John-Paul’s parents, the couple managed to live a simple and happy life. All was forgiven within the Langbroek family by the time of John-Paul and Stacey’s wedding on January 3rd, 1986. For 20 years afterwards John-Paul practiced as a dentist and worked in a small but successful Surfers Paradise practice, which he owned and operated with Stacey.  

In 1999, on the advice of a friend at a cocktail party John-Paul joined the Queensland Liberal Party and the love affair with politics began. Though John-Paul ran and lost in the 2001 Surfers Paradise by-election, by 2004 he had accumulated mass support. Throughout the campaign, John Paul worked tirelessly to prove to the people of the electorate that he would represent them better than their current member, one-term independent MP Lex Bell. Luckily, all the hard work paid off. John-Paul won the seat of Surfers Paradise and started his life over again – this time in a political sense.  

John-Paul Langbroek is the Member for Surfers Paradise.  

John-Paul Langbroek is the Minister for Education, Training and Employment.  

John-Paul Langbroek is my father.  

To me, he is the epitome of strength, courage and resilience. His story is one that displays each of these characteristics in their best sense and that is why I feel that it is a story worth sharing.  


Wednesday, 25 April 2012

The Good, The Bad & The Ugly (Lecture 8)

The JOUR1111 lecture this week was about all ethics and advertising. 

Ethics is a branch of philosophy which seeks to address questions about morality; involving concepts such as good and bad, right and wrong, justice and virtue.

Advertising is the promotion of a company's products and services carried out primarily to drive sales but also to build a brand identity. Advertising has become an essential element of the corporate world and companies now allot a considerable amount of their budget to advertising.

We've all witnessed our fair share of tacky, tasteful, ethical and unethical advertisements. It has become increasingly clear that advertisers believe the only way to sell a product is to produce a crude, albeit occasionally very witty, ad to accompany it.

For an advertisement to be considered unethical is must:
- degrade or underestimate the substitute or rival's product
- give false or misleading information
- fail to give useful information on the side effects of the product
- be immoral


The most popular kind of unethical ads are ones considered to be sexist. Here are some samples:









The figures released by Free TV Australia show that on average Australians watch 3 hours and 9 minutes of television a day. In those 3 hours, we are exposed to hundreds of commercials, promoting hundreds of different products and services.  Some commercials are memorable due to the humor attached to the product or service; others are remembered for their dramatic messages, whether it be positive or negative, overt or implied; whilst others replay in our minds simply because they’re totally overplayed and we have to watch them basically every time we turn on our televisions.  


Some television ads taken off television due to their 'controversial' nature include:


'Where the bloody hell are you?' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7KSPSNwppo 


and


'Bugger' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRxcGnBpvVs


Even though many advertisements have been cancelled from television or taken down off billboards due to their unethical content at least society still has a sense of humour when it comes to Fernwood gym:



This ad received NO complaints :)



Thursday, 19 April 2012

If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all.

Ok. Can everyone please take a deep breath and calm down?

Ever since I posted my latest blog about public media I have been receiving nasty comments from people who feel the need to anonymously attack a 19 year old girl about an article written for a university assessment. I really hope that these people are satisfied with themselves.

I've had people commenting on my grammar, or apparently my lack-of, my family and I personally feel the need to apologise.

I am SO sorry that I don't always read over what I've written. But the point of this particular assessment is not to have perfect spelling and grammar, but to write a blog about whatever I currently find interesting in media and to provide an overview about the lecture from this week. Sometimes I have so many ideas spilling out of my head that I type as quickly as I can so I can jot them all down before I forget them. So I'm just clarifying to all the readers who think I can't write or spell.

I am SO sorry for writing about my family. Once again, the aim of this assignment is to write about aspects of journalism and the media. I can't help it if my family happens to tie in with these topics. I am simply drawing upon personal experiences which is what's required for the blog. I value the opinion of my course co-ordinator and lecturer, Bruce Redman (who's personally informed me that he likes my style of writing), over the anonymous randoms who spend their time reading blogs designed for a university assignment.

I'm not trying to attack anyone or deter people from reading my blog but I was pretty fed up with the amount of negativity my last post garnered. I'm just trying to have some fun with this blog. If you took the time to read my first post you would know that it's taken a lot of confidence for me to create a blog in the first place and start voicing my opinion on certain topics. Having people trying to tear me down is quite disheartening but I'm not going to let it get me down. This blog is important to me and will act like a personal treasure trove of material for use later at University and beyond.

So, as the song says, 'why can't we be friends?'

Monday, 16 April 2012

Is Public Media Bias Real? (Lecture 7)

I'd like for all of you to do something for me right now. Its quick, simple and easy. I'm sure you'll all be able to manage (even the arts students :P)...


Type into the browser www.abc.net.au

.......


Ok, have you done it? Good. Now have a good look at the website: read some of the headlines, look at the accompanying pictures. 


Now, please type in www.ninemsn.com.au into the web browser. 


Have a read over this webpage. Skim the articles, photo's etc. 










What did you notice was the biggest difference in these two news sites? They both pride themselves on providing the latest news from around the country and the world. However, one of the websites is a commercial media outlet whilst the other is a public media outlet. Can you guess which is which? Here's a hint: the public media website is government owned and only publishes 'real news' articles. You won't see the public media site publishing stories such as "Toddlers and Tiaras: The top 10 most screwed up beauty pageant kids", with an accompanying slideshow. 


This week in JOUR1111 we learnt all about public media. That is, sources that tell us the news, educate our children, entertain us, show us local government in action, and help us participate in our communities. In Australia, our two primary public media broadcasters are the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the Special Broadcasting Service (SBS). Both broadcast on free-to-air television and radio, and both are owned by the Australian Government. 


The ABC is often accused of bias in its coverage of news and current affairs.Various politicians and commentators such as Andrew Bolt, Tim Blair and Gerard Henderson have accused the ABC of a left-wing bias, while similar criticisms of a conservative bias, particularly in its coverage of economic issues, have also come from Labor politicians such as  Bob Hawke and Paul Keating.


Soon after the 1996 federal election, John Howard's Liberal Party government reduced the ABC's operating grants by 10% The appointment of Jonathan Shier to the position of managing director was also controversial, for his programme of budget cuts, restructuring, and the loss of several high-profile personalities and shows. 


However, a 2004 Roy Morgan media credibility survey found that media professionals regarded ABC Radio as the most accurate news source in the country.


So they're clearly doing something right!



Tuesday, 3 April 2012

How Real is Reality TV? (Lecture 6)

The Urban Dictionary definition of Reality Television is 
' A mutated breed of documentary television that was once innovative, but today is a faux depiction of life, with scripted lines, and ignorant participants. Shows are typically pumped with drama, alcohol and sex. Reality TV is partially responsible for the downfall of American society'.

Whilst I wholly agree with a majority of the above definition, there is one part that I wish to dispute; 'reality tv is partially responsible for the downfall of American society'. Now although I believe this sentence to be true due to shows such as Jersey Shore and The Real Housewives of (insert name here), I also believe that it isn't just the American society that has suffered due to this new style of television. Europe and even Australia now have their own spin-offs of the highly rated programs, with The Only Way is Essex, Made in Chelsea and the already controversial new show The Shire (filmed in south Sydney's Sutherland Shire).

Whilst I once considered myself a 'reality tv junkie', I now often find myself disgusted with the behaviour of some of these so-called 'stars' (Nicole 'Snooki' Polizzi anyone?). They basically spend the 41 minute episodes of Jersey Shore drinking, sleeping and fighting. But somehow they manage to garner millions of viewers and fans who tune in every week to watch as the cast earn $30 000 an episode for doing nothing! I was shocked to find out that even the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (Prince William and Kate Middleton) are fans of reality tv!





As we learnt from this weeks JOUR1111 Lecture, reality television is a result of the profit-driven industry of Commercial Media. The business of Commercial Media is to generate audiences, and through careful observation they have found that audiences love watching whiny twenty-somethings causing constant drama and strife amongst each other. And through these television audiences, advertisers can promote and sell their products. 

So due to the soaring popularity of all these reality shows, it seems they wont be going anywhere anytime soon. And in that case...

Snooki for President??